Course Details
Cost
FREE
Upcoming Schedule
- On demand
Course Provider
Coursera online courses
Coursera's online classes are designed to help students achieve mastery over
course material. Some of the best professors in the world - like neurobiology
professor and author Peggy Mason from the University of Chicago, and computer
science professor and Folding@Home director Vijay Pande - will supplement your
knowledge through video lectures. They will also provide challenging
assessments, interactive exercises during each lesson, and the opportunity to
use a mobile app to keep up with yo...
Coursera's online classes are designed to help students achieve mastery over
course material. Some of the best professors in the world - like neurobiology
professor and author Peggy Mason from the University of Chicago, and computer
science professor and Folding@Home director Vijay Pande - will supplement your
knowledge through video lectures. They will also provide challenging
assessments, interactive exercises during each lesson, and the opportunity to
use a mobile app to keep up with your coursework. Coursera also partners with
the US State Department to create “learning hubs” around the world. Students
can get internet access, take courses, and participate in weekly in-person
study groups to make learning even more collaborative. Begin your journey into
the mysteries of the human brain by taking courses in neuroscience. Learn how
to navigate the data infrastructures that multinational corporations use when
you discover the world of data analysis. Follow one of Coursera’s “Skill
Tracks”. Or try any one of its more than 560 available courses to help you
achieve your academic and professional goals.
Provider Subject Specialization
Humanities
Sciences & Technology
Course Description
This course teaches scientists to become more effective writers, using practical examples and exercises. Topics include: principles of good writing, tricks for writing faster and with less anxiety, the format of a scientific manuscript, and issues in publication and peer review.
Sort By
- 1 review
- 1 completed
7 years, 4 months ago
This course is a tough call: a very diverse group of students with widely
varying needs, as expressed on the class forums, from students wanting to
improve their English to graduate students looking for help with drafting
chapters to professional editors looking to establish a network to
professional academics checking out a Humanities course in MOOC-format. So, it
would be hard to cater to the expectations of all these groups. Other
reviewers have noted the course's positives for them: practical instruction on
how to edit; setting standards for scientific writing in journals; encouraging
reflection on their own writing. These are significant successes and I don't
want to diminish them in the slightest. My interest was in the content, use of
technology, experience of assessment and, crucially, sustaining attention. I
also have a research project in scientific writing and I was looking for
another perspective. So, my interests are nar...
This course is a tough call: a very diverse group of students with widely
varying needs, as expressed on the class forums, from students wanting to
improve their English to graduate students looking for help with drafting
chapters to professional editors looking to establish a network to
professional academics checking out a Humanities course in MOOC-format. So, it
would be hard to cater to the expectations of all these groups. Other
reviewers have noted the course's positives for them: practical instruction on
how to edit; setting standards for scientific writing in journals; encouraging
reflection on their own writing. These are significant successes and I don't
want to diminish them in the slightest. My interest was in the content, use of
technology, experience of assessment and, crucially, sustaining attention. I
also have a research project in scientific writing and I was looking for
another perspective. So, my interests are narrow and partial but MOOCs are for
everyone, right? The course satisfied my last interest most successfully: I've
not edited a scientific journal so it was illuminating to watch the instructor
doing the hard yards on the page. I also appreciated watching an American
editor at work. My field is English language and it's endlessly fascinating to
watch how English differs across the cultures in which it's used. At the risk
of sounding churlish, may I be frank about the other points? I found the
content very limited. "Good writing" is the high aim but, as the peer
reviewing exercise showed, there are many different kinds of writing in the
sciences. So it would have been useful to look at writing in a range of
journals, from a range of disciplines and a range of genres. The technology is
(mostly) pretty good: Coursera has invested heavily in the platform and it's
paid off. Two suggestions, though: a video lecture that goes over 15 minutes
wastes the potential of online technology. The instructor knows her material
and is convincing but anyone talking online, in the same pose, the same manner
and, often, reiterating multiple examples is going to lose the audience.
Second, one of the flexibilities of online — and a big selling point for the
format — is the student's ability to sequence and progress at an individual
rate. So, locking down the modules week by week is a disincentive. I'm a big
fan of peer assessment and, in this case, students had the chance to get their
hands dirty and do some editing. I spent a lot of time on this part and
reviewed more assignments than required. But without supporting rubrics or
some kind of scaffolding it's a lottery and the risk is a dive to the bottom,
rather than the middle. The research I've read on this topic supports this
argument. I accept that the embedded quiz has the advantage of immediacy but —
forgive me — it's not checking whether I've "understood the preceeding
material," it's checking my capacity to remember what the video just said.
That said, I'm very grateful to have done this course. My interest was really
sustained, though, not so much by the material or the format but by the
questions the experience raised for me both as a researcher in scientific
writing and as a professional academic. Humanities courses are not immediately
suited to online modality. Coursera's Daphne Koller hit the nail on the head
when she called MOOCs "data-drive" rather than "hypthesis-driven" learning.
So, there's a significant challenge for the Humanities where it's all pretty
much hypothesis-driven knowledge. I imagine that an area like this one might
be sequenced with, say, this course providing a general introduction and then
one or two others that develop by being more specialised. One of the
instructor's real skills is technical precision and another more specialised
course would provide more scope. This course would then become the pre-
requisite for later courses. Thanks for the opportunity to review this course;
thanks for the opporunity to *do* course.
- 65 reviews
- 59 completed
5 days, 5 hours ago
Great course for everybody, who's interested in Science Writing, and any kind of Smart Writing (including Business Writing) overall.
The course explores, how to build the most comprehensive and clear text, while maintaining scientific tone. There's a lot of practical advises and useful technics.
Some of the interviews and invited guests materials in the end were pretty boring, but most of the material is very nice.
- 2 reviews
- 2 completed
1 year, 5 months ago
This course provides applicable and easy-to-follow guidance on writing and communication in general.
Dr. Kristin Sainani is a humorous and methodical instructor who can explain things inside out, taking the big pictures and the nitty-gritty both into account.
Student
10/10 starsCompleted
3 years, 8 months ago
English is not my native language. I have been writing a lot since middle school and was known of relatively good writing compared to my colleagues. However, this course teaches you how to make your writing effective, instead of just writing; this is like the difference between knowing how to cook some food and how to cook first class food. I was ashamed of my first paper after I took the course. My first paper I developed after this course landed in a 2-tier journal, although it is my second one in my career. Highly recommended!
- 7 reviews
- 6 completed
6 years, 1 month ago
Excellent course covering writing style and the publication process. The peer-
review system for the dissertations is still imperfect, but this does not
prevent the course from achieving its goals. This course is particularly
useful when starting a master or a PhD thesis, but I am sure anyone could
benefit from it as well.
- 86 reviews
- 77 completed
7 years, 2 months ago
Writing scientific papers is a skill that every scientist must learn. It
doesn't come naturally, as most people believe - the language and structure of
papers are very peculiar, and there are certain expectations that reviewers
and editors have that we'll sooner or later clash with. This course is a
magnificent piece of work. It explains very clearly all the basics (and even
some advanced tricks) needed to write quality papers. More than that, it gives
the essentials for quality writing in English. It includes lots of training
(writing and reviewing other people's writing), so it's very engaging. The
best thing I can say about it is that after taking it I looked back at some
papers I had written as a young PhD that were rejected by several journals -
and now I know exactly why. They look like school reports and not like
scientific papers.
- 8 reviews
- 7 completed
7 years, 5 months ago
Your basic run of the mill course. No interactivity between professor / staff
and studnents. All matterials are lectures, with power point presentation.
While I was able to learn from this and did pick up a lot of writing tips I
didn't know before, I didn't feel motivated and engaged enough in the course
to attempt the essays. Watching the videos pretty much provided all the
practice I felt I needed to grasp the concept. The weekly 'homeworks' gave
extra practice, but the grading system made them very difficult to gauge.
- 1 review
- 1 completed
7 years, 4 months ago
Professor Sainani is brilliant; she is a genius. If anyone out there still
doubts that we live in a special era of equal opportunity education, such
doubts will fade away after taking this course. Great praise to Stanford and
coursera for making this possible.
- 1 review
- 1 completed
7 years, 4 months ago
A very good course for anybody in the science field. I got to lo learn a lot
of tricks and techniques which have definitely helped me in viewing "boring
scientific journals" in a whole new way. (Everytime I read something jargonny
and boring, I want to lash out my red pen and start editing it). I wish we all
change the way we write, it will just be more fun to read for everyone. A big
fat thank you to Kristin Sainani and all the other members of staff for all
their effort and time. I have truely been infected ;)
- 8 reviews
- 7 completed
7 years, 4 months ago
Outstanding course and outstanding Professor! I will never write or read the
same way I used to do. The course far exceeded my expectations and I would
love to see a second edition soon. Thank you to Professor Sainani, to Stanford
University and to Coursera. You are truly writing the future!
- 2 reviews
- 2 completed
7 years, 3 months ago
The best thing about the course are the 3 interviews with the outside journal
editors. The good thing about the course is most people will learn something
from it. Unfortunately, the instructor needs to learn English grammar.
- 11 reviews
- 10 completed
7 years, 4 months ago
This course is tailored for people just starting out in the sciences, but many
of the topics and exercises could be useful for anyone who wants to write
better. The concepts are presented clearly, with plenty of examples, and
Kristin Sainani is an engaging lecturer. The writing assignments in this
course are done using peer review, and I found the system more useful than for
other courses. Rather than just grading essays using a rubric, you actually
edit the other essays in a mini word processing program. It takes a good deal
of time to do thoughtfully, but I found that I learned a lot from the
exercise. I would like to see more peer review systems move in this direction
-- perhaps not to actual editing, but beyond the basic grading rubric.
- 1 review
- 1 completed
7 years, 4 months ago
This course brought a very diverse group of students with different
expectations. I learned a lot more than I had hoped and these skills will
improve more than just scientific writing. There is no professor/student
interaction (although the professor posts on the discussion board) so if you
are expecting to be hand-held this course is not for you.